Hal Colebatch reveals that a British supporter of a murderous ideology has been brought onstage by an Australian Leftist to applaud – Kevin Rudd. Quadrant Online
After questioning Abbott’s mental health on 774 Melbourne, our ABC’s Marieke Hardy, is now demonising Bob Katter, also a Catholic, along with Liberal/National voters.
Former NSW Labor Premier Morris Iemma said there were big swings last Saturday against the ALP in some of the party’s safest Sydney seats because Labor had abandoned “multicultural Australia”.
Melbourne ABC radio presenter Jon Faine said it was okay when Victorian Victorian Premier John Brumby arrived 30 minutes late for an interview. Back in March, Faine wasn’t so relaxed when Tony Abbott was 20 minutes late.
By Mark Durie
In The Third Choice, Mark Durie, in clear language free from political correctness and backed by an impressive scholarly knowledge, unfolds, step-by-step, the basic foundations of Islam and exposes their inner correlations with jihad and dhimmitude.
More information »
By John Dawson
The history wars have spread fear and loathing through the besieged halls of academia. The veracity of university-based historians and their versions of our past have been under assault as never before.
More information »Register with Australian Conservative and receive our FREE email Newsletter.
Click to Register
I’m not well up on Aussie history; nor am I sure which Hobsbawm you mean. I hope it isn’t the E.J. one who (for example) regarded the deaths of tens of millions in the USSR as ‘deleterious’ to what he called socialism, meaning of course the Jewish-supremacist mass murder variety. Hobsbawm is a near-perfect illustration of an ‘historian’ with a secret agenda, namely promotion of his racist cult. He’s a modern version of ultra-nationalist historians around the world who omit unjustifiable deeds by their own side. He’s also as might be expected an utterly third-rate mind – his books are simply plagiarised from sources he approves. Revisionist-minded people will find some consderbale amusement from his repetitive nonsense.
My issue is that this is exactly what Rudd wants:
Hobsbawm praises Rudd’s courage in recognising the depth of the present crisis. However, he thinks Rudd underestimates the difficulty of what now needs to be done.
As Howard said: policy should not be in the middle of an argument it should be in the mainstream of the argument (median?)
Cheers,
Mish